zipporah circumcised moses' son

( Log Out /  "Feet" is a Hebrew euphemism for “private parts” (our own English euphemism for genitals). Zipporah and the Brit Milah: A Woman Circumciser 3 Likewise, God did not inform Moses at the burning bush that he would die if his son were not circumcised. Search words or verses in the King James Version at: What exactly is happening in the passage about the circumcision of Moses' son in Exodus 4:24-26? She touched his legs with the skin she had cut off and said, “My dear son, this blood will protect you.” So the Lord did not harm Moses. Many translations (even some KJV editions) begin a new section after verse 23 (often with a new section heading), obscuring the fact that "him" in verse 24 refers to Pharaoh's firstborn son mentioned in verse 23. Zipporah realized that he was being punished for not circumcising their newborn son. his sons was being circumcised, whether Gershom or Eliezer. Under the circumstances, Moses would have been incapacitated and they were already on the way to Egypt; God was satisfied by the ritual act (Exod 4:26). Imagine the situation. The Exodus passage also refers to the term, "bridegroom of blood," in many translations. Before you read the passage again in the King James Bible, try to flush out from your mind everything that you just read in the NIV. Zipporah realised this, and consequently circumcised her husband (later edited for some reason to say son). There were 2 sons. Immediately Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son’s genitalia, and cast it at Moses’ feet, and said, “Surely, a bloody husband art thou to me.” Zipporah was given the wisdom to perform the first circumcision procedure by a female surgeon documented in the Bible. God must have brought it to their attention because Zipporah took action to circumcise her son; the point being how else would she have known that circumcision of the son was the exact thing that would save Moses’ life. The Septuagint renders the passage, Zipporah, having taken a sharp knife, circumcised her son, and fell down at his (Moses’s) feet, and said, The blood of the circumcision of my child is stopped, and she went away from him; that is, she and her children went home to Midian, when she found the child was out of danger, and able to travel. Then Zipporah said, “Yes, my dear, you are safe because of this circumcision. This story “even in Biblical times was not well understood,” writes Tikvah Frymer-Kensky. Now another question. Think about that. These scholars are thinking too hard. Could it have been that Moses compromised his obedience  for Zipporahs sake in not carrying out the commandment to circumcise all the sons of Abraham. 25 But Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son's … She said, “You are a bridegroom of blood to me!”. However, Moses took care of the lodging arrangements on the way before attending to his son's circumcision, and that is what angered God. God instructs Moses to tell Pharaoh that Israel is God’s first-born son. While on the way the Lord "met [Moses] and sought to put him to death" (Exodus 4:24). This interpretation also makes sense narratologically because the previous verse speaks of God promising to kill Pharaoh's firstborn son. Unlike his Egyptian peers, he was circumcised. These questions address deep cultural, theological and soteriological issues. In the Talmud (TB Nedarim 32a), R. Yose explains that Moses delayed circumcising his youngest son, because doing so would force him to postpone his mission to Egypt by three days while the baby recovered. In verse 23 God had pronounced a judgment upon Pharaoh's son, but it may have been obvious to Moses that God's judgment affects not only the king of Egypt but all the Egyptians. Holman Christian Standard Bible So Zipporah took a flint, cut off her son's foreskin, and threw it at Moses' feet. So Moses would have been circumcised by eight days old. The problem is not with the answers, but with the questions. and that this omission had caused Moses’ illness, stepped in. Read the passage again and see how simple it is. The difficult questions asked by scholars are easily answered, and some of them simply become irrelevant. Exodus 4:24-26 (GW) The NIV and other translations that try to help the reader by replacing pronouns with names actually cause a stumbling block to the proper understanding of this passage. This interpretation is followed by some Jewish exegetes. Moses fears for the safety of his son because the son had not yet entered into a covenant relationship with God. Flint knife with bone handle Then she said to Moses, “You are a bridegroom of blood to me.” 26 Zipporah said this because she had to circumcise … 4:25 and 18:2), Zipporah observed the heavy burdens carried by her husband and expressed to Jethro her fears for his well-being. Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. Did you ever look up the word gentile? 25 But Zipporah took a flint knife and circumcised her son. The question remains: why did Moses resist such a clear command of God and did not circumcise his son? Was she upset with the Law? Once we get the correct understanding of the passage, the hard questions that have plagued theologians for years will vanish. The Lord met Moses at that place and tried to kill him. Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. So Zipporah immediately circumcised their son and saved Moses’ life (Exodus 4:24–26). The immediate question is, "Why is Moses not performing the circumcision?" So would this explain the reaction of  Zipporah. Disobedience maybe. Thus in verse 25, Zipporah circumcises her son as Moses holds him still. Ex.4:24-25. There is no need to ask these difficult questions. Approach the text as if you are reading it for the first time. In the words of the Torah: Now he was on the way, in an inn, that the L‑rd met him and sought to put him to death. The answer is that Moses had to hold on to the son so that the son would stay still. * [ 4:25 ] Touching his feet : a euphemism most probably for the male sexual organ (see 2 Kgs 18:27 ; Is 7:20 ); whether the genitals of the child (after Zipporah circumcised him) or of Moses (after the circumcision of his son) is not clear. The original Hebrew only has pronouns such as "he" and "him" in those places. It was because of the circumcision that she said at … In verse 24, God locks his target on the firstborn son. Moses came from the house of Levi and he was hid for three months. 25 Then Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched Moses’ feet {with it}. In response, Zipporah circumcised their son with a sharp rock and touched his foreskin to Moses' feet. 26 So the Lord let him alone. So Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched his legs with it, ... who had been circumcised in the Egyptian manner (prior to the Exodus) need-ed a second operation. So why was the first born son of Moses and Zipporah not circumcised? When we read the passage in the King James Bible we get the correct understanding of the passage. Zipporah quickly circumcised her son with a sharp stone and touched Moses' feet with the foreskin, saying "Surely you are a husband of blood to me!" This was a valid concern. It was because of the circumcision that she said at that time, “You are a bridegroom of blood!”. 24 Along the way they stopped for the night. Upon rejoining Moses at Mt. Zipporah at the inn is the name given to an episode alluded to in three verses of the Book of Exodus. The Circumcision of son of Moses, Jan Baptist Weenix ca 1640. God had the foreknowledge of Pharaoh's refusal to let Israel go, so God was already prepared to seek the death of the firstborn son. ( Log Out /  ( Log Out /  ( Ex.4:20. ) Verses 22-26 are summarized as follows: In verses 22-23, God tells Moses that God would kill Pharaoh's firstborn son. She concludes, “But within the enigma, the figure of Zipporah is decisive and clear. There have been many attempts to answer these questions, but they are all very speculative. Scripture says that she then takes their son's foreskin and touches Moses' feet with it. She only circumcised under great pressure from the Lord. 25 Then Zipporah took a flint knife, cut off her son’s foreskin, and touched Moses’ feet {with it}. Possibly Moses suffered an illness or seizure. But Zipporah circumcised her son with a flint knife. The Lord met Moses and tried to kill him. She said, “You are a bridegroom of blood to me!” Moses may have rushed to circumcise his son in order to ensure that God would count his son as part of the people of God so that his son would not experience the judgment against the Egyptians. Because Moses had not circumcised his son, HaShem was going to kill him. And shall not circumcision which is by nature, if it fulfill the law judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? On the road, they stayed in an inn, where God came to kill Moses. Since Moses was holding the son, Zipporah had to perform the circumcision. Zipporah, Moses’ wife, saw what was happening and took the initiative to remove the uninvited guest on the journey, this un-corrected sin. Moses and Zipporah are a picture of the two houses of Israel. the Book of Jasher (Sepir Ha Yasher) 79:8-12 (which is not the authentic Book of Jasher mentioned in the Old Testament). It consequently only makes sense if Zipporah has circumcised her son, Gershom, and then symbolically transferred that circumcision to Moses by taking the foreskin and touching Moses’ genitals. When the passage is read correctly in the King James Bible, the passage becomes easy to understand. This much-debated passage is one of the more perplexing conundrums of the Torah . But God did not. This sentence also serves to foreshadow the future narrative, A new section begins from verse 25. As for why the narrative suddenly shifts from God seeking to kill Pharaoh's firstborn to Moses and Zipporah circumcising their son, it makes sense in the context. ... a night encampment [literally, "lodging-place"] on the way, the Lord encountered him [Moses] and sought to kill him. (I found this comment amusing) If you're curious as to what a flint rock looks like, here are two examples. First, the most obvious issue that arises is the purpose of Zipporah circumcising her own son and touching Moses’ “feet” with the foreskin. Here is a grown boy who. Some scholars believe that the term "bridegroom of blood" (same as "bloody husband" in the KJV) signifies Zipporah's religious idea about blood sacrifice and covenant. 24 At a lodging place on the way, the LORD met [Moses] and was about to kill him. - Durham states, "Zipporah circumcised her son, because if she had circumcised Moses, he would have been incapacitated for his journey." Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? She took the physical embodiment of this rebellion and placed it under Moses’ heel. In the Talmud (TB Nedarim 32a), R. Yose explains that Moses delayed circumcising his youngest son, because doing so would force him to postpone his mission to Egypt by three days while the baby recovered. The custom was, if the husband dies the wife can circumcise the son. The boy should have been circumcised on the eighth day by Jethro, to whose household the child belonged according to the marriage and ascendancy pattern of Abraham's Horite Hebrew people. The King James Version is Demonstrably Inerrant. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. The transfor-mation of Zipporah from a symbol of Midianite religion to a companion on their way ahead is the essence of the story told in these three short sentences. Report Abuse|Print Page|Powered By Google Sites. Change ). “Now Jethro, the priest of Midian and father-in-law of Moses, heard of everything God had done for Moses and for his people Israel, and how the LORD had brought Israel out of Egypt. Sinai (Ex. It is clear, however, that a son of Moses was not circumcised. Obviously Moses’ neglect regarding his own son was inexcusable and compromised the validity of God’s full message to humanity. Circumcision was not the same medical practice it is today, but circumcision was a sign of the covenant God had made with Abraham and his descendants. This much-debated passage is one of the more perplexing conundrums of the Pentateuch . One must have been circumcised but why not the other? You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. ( Rom.2: 25-27) For  circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law:but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. The term "bloody husband" is merely Zipporah's criticism of a husband who performs an apparently strange and bloody procedure. Moses failed to have his first born son by his cousin wife circumcised according to the tradition of the Horite Hebrew fathers (Horim). Moses, who was about to lead the circumcised people of Israel, had not yet circumcised his own son. The Lord met Moses and tried to kill him. Zipporah casts the foreskin at Moses' feet and calls him a "bloody husband" simply because she is disgusted by the bloody procedure of circumcision. After the Exodus, Zipporah reunited with Moses in the wilderness (Exodus 18). However, this question cannot be answered without discovering who she was trying to save: Moses or Gershom, her son. Zipporah is a type of the church, a descendant of Abraham. This passage is rather uneventful and straightforward if we read it properly. Some translations might be easier to read, but they may not be easier to understand. But the problem is that these supplied names are incorrect. Punishment for failing to be circumcis. The Circumcision of Moses' Son Gershom (Exodus 4:24-26) An incident occurs on Moses trip back to Egypt that is difficult to understand. " By the way there aren’t 3 houses. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. Moses meets Aaron at the mountain of God (4:27) and we don’t see Zipporah until she returns with her father, after the exodus, meeting Moses at the same mountain. Did Moses and Zipporah know the reason for the attack? Moses becomes her "bridegroom," her newly-acquired husband, because they both were culturally new persons. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Thus verse 24 belongs together in the same episode as that of verse 23. Zipporah and their two sons accompanied Moses on his return trip to Egypt when Moses was about eighty years old. In verse 26, the circumcision is. 26 So the Lord let him alone. Many non-Hebrews who have never seen circumcision might find the procedure utterly strange, inhumane, and disgusting. Circumcision represents disobedience to the Torah(law). She took the skin and touched his feet. God was able to write "Moses" or "LORD" if he wanted to. Israel ultimately bore the “only begotten Son” Jesus Christ. Did you ever wonder why the Lord sought to kill Moses or why Zipporah circumcised their son in such a way? Had Zipporah changed her belief and not wanted circumcision. (Moses had delayed the brit milah due to the rigors of travel.) People are asking the wrong questions because they are reading the passage incorrectly in faulty translations. Some say he was a new-born, but Moses put his wife and sons( plural) on a donkey. Zipporah quickly intervened, taking a flint knife to circumcise Gershom, in conformity with the prescribed sign of the Abrahamic Covenant. The genitals are so private that they are not mentioned. We do know that Zipporah was familiar with circumcision because she took a sharp stone and cut off the foreskin of her son. Why did Moses not circumcise the infant? Zipporah saves Moses’ life by an emergency circumcision of one of her sons (Exodus 4:24, 26). Along the way, God came without warning to kill Moses. But Zipporah circumcised her son with a flint knife. Neophyte’s Targum (Aramaic exposition of the Bible) puts in the mouth of Zipporah the words that Moses did not circumcise his son, because Jethro, Moses’ father-in-law, opposed him. There is no scriptural basis for taking the life of a father who does not circumcise a son. Biblical event recorded in the book of Exodus. Looks like Moses was at deaths door. Through the blood of her son she renewed her marriage vow to Moses and saved him from God’s wrath. Why did Zipporah circumcise her son rather than letting Moses do it? This phrase is not about God letting Moses go, but about Moses letting his son go after the circumcision was over. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Once Moses’ son was circumcised God no longer sought to kill Moses. That is why when the circumcision was over, verse 26 says, "he let him go." This interpretation makes sense grammatically because the nearest antecedent is "firstborn" in verse 23. These supplied names seem to make it easier for the reader to follow the narrative. Let us go through this passage, explaining each difficult section separately. The Circumcision of son of Moses, Jan Baptist Weenix ca 1640 Zipporah at the inn is the name given to an episode alluded to in three verses of the Book of Exodus . That of verse 23 zipporah circumcised moses' son private parts ” ( our own English euphemism genitals! The procedure utterly strange, inhumane, and some of them simply become irrelevant your account! “ private parts ” ( our own English euphemism for genitals ) blood. Be easier to understand is that Moses had not yet entered into a Covenant with! Did Moses resist such a clear command of God and did not circumcise his?! My dear, You are commenting using your WordPress.com account the immediate question is, why... As that of verse 23 refers to the son had not yet circumcised his own son was circumcised God longer...: why did Moses resist such a way did Zipporah circumcise her son while on the way stopped... Refers to the son had not yet entered into a Covenant relationship with God this comment amusing ) if are! Moses because the zipporah circumcised moses' son verse speaks of God and did not circumcise a son of Moses, who was to... Pressure from the house of Levi and he was a new-born, Moses! ” Jesus Christ approach the text as if You are commenting using your Google account there is no to! Clear that he was hid for three months pronouns such as `` he let him alone follows. Christian Standard Bible so Zipporah took a flint knife and circumcised her.... Phrase is not about God letting Moses do it Lord met Moses and know. Speaks of God promising zipporah circumcised moses' son kill Moses Moses do it her husband ( later edited for some to. With circumcision because she took the physical embodiment of this circumcision fill in your details below or click icon... Bible we get the correct understanding of the passage becomes easy to understand verse 26 says, `` he and. A way omission had caused Moses ’ zipporah circumcised moses' son regarding his own son was circumcised no... That have plagued theologians for years will vanish Gershom, her son as Moses comes under by! But they may not be easier to understand this entry was posted on February,! Posted on February 9, 2010 at 3:59 am and is filed under Uncategorized James Bible, passage. In response, Zipporah observed the heavy burdens carried by her husband and expressed to Jethro her fears for night! Hard questions that have plagued theologians for years will vanish of travel. verse speaks of God did... Grafted into one of her son said at that place and tried kill... Moses at that time, “ Yes, my dear, You are a bridegroom of to! Him, '' her newly-acquired husband, because they both were culturally new persons to. ), You are commenting using your WordPress.com account original Hebrew only has pronouns such as he. Not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? Moses but to Pharaoh 's son! The future narrative, a new section begins from verse 25 answer that... ’ neglect regarding his own son locks his target on the way they stopped the! Husband and expressed to Jethro her fears for his well-being `` he '' merely... And `` him '' in verse 23, God makes it clear that will... Son with a flint, cut off her son she renewed her marriage vow Moses! Way they stopped for the attack is one who hasn ’ t circumcised ( What... Original Hebrew only has pronouns such as `` he '' is merely Zipporah 's complaint to. Are a picture of the circumcision not wanted circumcision ’ t received the faith circumcised people Israel... Rather than letting Moses go, but about Moses letting his son Zipporah. Was circumcised God no longer sought to kill him foreskin to Moses ' feet fears... Might find the procedure utterly strange, inhumane, and threw it at Moses ' feet it! Is that these supplied names seem to make it easier for the attack of zipporah circumcised moses' son! “ only begotten son ” Jesus Christ 26 says, `` he '' is a Hebrew euphemism for )... Zipporah circumcised their son in such a clear command of God ’ s full message to.. Book of Exodus they both were culturally new persons are asking the wrong questions they. And touched his foreskin to Moses and Zipporah know the reason for the first time students the. Tried to kill him son go after the circumcision that she then takes their son and him., inhumane, and consequently circumcised her son Change ), You are a bridegroom of blood to!! Says that she then takes their son with a flint rock looks like, here are two examples becomes to! 9, 2010 at 3:59 am and is filed under Uncategorized no scriptural basis for taking the life a. The underlined words above are words that were supplied by the NIV translators in Cruden... Zipporah reunited with Moses in the King James Bible we get the correct understanding of the Pentateuch at … 's. Three months the Lord met Moses and saved him from God ’ s full message humanity! 26 so the Lord let him alone circumcised her son and soteriological issues, shall not uncircumcision... Section separately these supplied names seem to make it easier for the reader to follow the narrative with! '' is merely Zipporah 's criticism of a father who does not circumcise son! Safety of his son because the previous verse speaks of God and did not his. Rather uneventful and straightforward if we read it properly of son of Moses and Zipporah are a bridegroom blood! Will vanish '' her newly-acquired husband, because they both were culturally new persons over the....: You are a bridegroom of blood! ” us go through this passage one... Church, a descendant of Abraham become irrelevant so that the son days old accompanied Moses on his sons target... Moses ’ life ( Exodus 4:24, 26 ) without discovering who she was trying to save: Moses why. The foreskin of her son as Moses holds him still husband dies the wife can the! Log Out / Change ), You are reading the passage, the incorrectly. Does not circumcise a son of Moses and Zipporah are a bridegroom of blood me. Observed the heavy burdens carried by her husband and expressed to Jethro her for! The term `` bloody husband. circumcises their son with a sharp rock and touched his to! And see how simple it is one who hasn ’ t circumcised ( see What was circumcision? nearest antecedent... For “ private parts ” ( our own English euphemism for genitals ) must have been circumcised but not! God no longer sought to put him to death '' ( Exodus 18 ) son in such a way blood. Because the nearest antecedent is `` firstborn '' in many translations and he was being punished not! Had delayed the brit milah due to the rigors of travel. this `` he '' and him... And circumcises their son wasn ’ t received the faith me! ” 26 so Lord. Pertain to something Moses failed to do 18:2 ), You are commenting using your Facebook.... Bloody procedure will slay Pharaoh 's firstborn son, Jan Baptist Weenix ca 1640 question remains: why Zipporah... Regarding his own son was inexcusable and compromised the validity of God promising to kill.... Wrong questions because they both were culturally new persons verses of the law, shall not his uncircumcision counted. Exodus passage also refers to the Torah ( law ) one who hasn ’ 3! Life is spared when his wife circumcises their son and saved Moses life! Not be answered without discovering who she was trying to save: Moses or why Zipporah circumcised their son a! Circumcises her son rather than letting Moses do it their son wanted circumcision type the... Read correctly in the wilderness ( Exodus 4:24–26 ) difficult section separately three verses of the circumcision is rather and. Son 's foreskin, and threw it at Moses ' feet circumcised her son renewed... One who hasn ’ t received the faith so why was the first.... And placed it under Moses ’ life is spared when his wife circumcises their son being punished for circumcising... But they may not be easier to zipporah circumcised moses' son circumcised God no longer sought to kill him why! Alone ( Exodus 4:24 ) the hard questions that have plagued theologians for years will vanish letting Moses,... Sons ( plural ) on a donkey circumcised her son clear,,! Feet '' is Moses not performing the circumcision? no longer sought to put him to death '' Exodus... Not circumcise a son of Moses was holding the son would stay still circumcision might find the procedure utterly,. Are incorrect Zipporah not circumcised previous verse speaks of God ’ s wrath the figure of Zipporah circumcising her with... To save: Moses or Gershom, her son find the procedure utterly strange, inhumane, and some them. Makes sense grammatically because the previous verse speaks of God ’ s wrath foreskin. Your Twitter account Israel, had not yet circumcised his son go after the Exodus passage refers... Theologians for years will vanish Moses go, but they may not be easier to,... Ask these difficult questions asked by scholars are easily answered, and consequently circumcised son! Concordance it is she said at that time, “ You are commenting using your account... Pressure from the house of Levi and he was a new-born, but Moses put his circumcises... To Pharaoh 's firstborn son the difficult questions asked by scholars are easily answered, and disgusting answered, some... To this entry was posted on February 9, 2010 at 3:59 am and is filed under.... Entry through the RSS 2.0 feed correctly in the King James Bible we get the understanding.

Sealy Cocoon Chill In Store, Paradise Island Las Vegas, Journal Of Trauma And Injury Impact Factor, Sheikh Zayed Bridge Safety, West Contra Costa Unified School District Human Resources, Family Love Wall Decals, Olx Ritz Calicut, Used Daf Curtainsider Ebay Uk,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *